<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Punk rock sterility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.liquidcross.com/2009/07/30/punk-rock-sterility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.liquidcross.com/2009/07/30/punk-rock-sterility/</link>
	<description>anger management via the written word</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>By: bt</title>
		<link>http://blog.liquidcross.com/2009/07/30/punk-rock-sterility/comment-page-1/#comment-2521</link>
		<dc:creator>bt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.liquidcross.com/2009/07/30/punk-rock-sterility/#comment-2521</guid>
		<description>you are right punk hasn&#039;t changed any in the last 20 years or so.... punk will always be the same three cord progression over and over again....let me see oh yea the other thing about punk is that the singer always sucks balls.. i mean come one.. i have yet to hear a singer in a punk band that sounds good.. they all sound like shit and they just bitch all the time...punk will never change because once it does all the so called true punk fans will says that the bands sold out.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are right punk hasn&#8217;t changed any in the last 20 years or so&#8230;. punk will always be the same three cord progression over and over again&#8230;.let me see oh yea the other thing about punk is that the singer always sucks balls.. i mean come one.. i have yet to hear a singer in a punk band that sounds good.. they all sound like shit and they just bitch all the time&#8230;punk will never change because once it does all the so called true punk fans will says that the bands sold out&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryo-Ohki</title>
		<link>http://blog.liquidcross.com/2009/07/30/punk-rock-sterility/comment-page-1/#comment-2517</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryo-Ohki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.liquidcross.com/2009/07/30/punk-rock-sterility/#comment-2517</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s about as far removed from punk as you can get, but if you want a genre where evolving happens at a near-exponential level, look no further than electronic music (including techno and its many subgenres).

While I&#039;m no expert on the genre, I am what most would probably call a casual fan, and have been since the mid 90s when a friend introduced me to the genre.  Techno music (which is a huge umbrella term that covers all of the subgenres, many of which are quite different from one another) has changed by leaps and bounds over the past 15 years.  I fully admit that even I&#039;m not fully up on what the current trends in electronic music are; they change so quickly that music produced as little as two years ago could be considered &quot;old&quot;.

But that&#039;s the appeal of electronic music to me; it&#039;s always on the move and never stands still.  I imagine this is at least in part because it&#039;s a type of music driven by technology.  As the technology improves from year to year, so do the possibilities of what can be done with it.  (And then you have geniuses like Raymond Scott who were ahead of the even the likes of Kraftwerk by a good 20 years!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about as far removed from punk as you can get, but if you want a genre where evolving happens at a near-exponential level, look no further than electronic music (including techno and its many subgenres).</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m no expert on the genre, I am what most would probably call a casual fan, and have been since the mid 90s when a friend introduced me to the genre.  Techno music (which is a huge umbrella term that covers all of the subgenres, many of which are quite different from one another) has changed by leaps and bounds over the past 15 years.  I fully admit that even I&#8217;m not fully up on what the current trends in electronic music are; they change so quickly that music produced as little as two years ago could be considered &#8220;old&#8221;.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s the appeal of electronic music to me; it&#8217;s always on the move and never stands still.  I imagine this is at least in part because it&#8217;s a type of music driven by technology.  As the technology improves from year to year, so do the possibilities of what can be done with it.  (And then you have geniuses like Raymond Scott who were ahead of the even the likes of Kraftwerk by a good 20 years!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

