As more and more CDs are coming in Digipak-style cardboard cases, I find myself becoming more and more annoyed.

Even if you’re not familiar with the patented name, you’re guaranteed to have come across a few Digipaks in your travels. These are CD cases made mostly (or sometimes completely) out of paper products, that unfold to reveal the disc, liner notes, et cetera. (They also have DVD cases that are built much the same way.)

My problem with Digipaks is their lack of durability. I take excellent care of my media, as I want it to last as long as possible. Unless you never remove them from your shelf, Digipaks are bound to get scuffed and worn, especially on the edges of their spines. Good old-fashioned jewel cases hold up much better than that. Plus, jewel cases are easily replaceable; Digipak albums have to be purchased again.

I understand that some artists use Digipaks to do clever creative things with the packaging, and that’s okay, I guess. I’m a big fan of collecting physical copies of my media, as I do like the artwork and such. What bugs me is when record labels just use it as a cost-cutting measure…but don’t drop the price of the CD itself. Unless you’re doing something with the packaging that cannot be replicated with a jewel case, then don’t bother.

Some might prefer Digipaks, claiming that their cardboard construction is better for the environment. Of course, most people aren’t throwing out CD cases like one would a plastic bag. Furthermore, additional printings of many CDs end up in jewel cases, anyway!

Clearly, this argument against Digipaks is one of personal preference. But guess what, it’s my damned blog, and my preference is solid plastic!