Twitter rhymes with “shitter”
August 23, 2010 Culture No Comments
I find Twitter to be a very useful tool for promoting this blog, as well as my other one. Furthermore, posting random tweets about my activities and interacting with others can be fun, too. However, Twitter does seem to be getting a little out of hand. Stereotypical Internet users and abusers are mostly to blame for this, but the company itself does not get off scot-free.
I do understand that at its core, Twitter is simply an extension of the user’s ego. When you tweet about your activities, you’re hoping that other people care enough about you in order to follow you and actively read what you have to say. This same principle applies to other online services like personal websites, photo galleries, social networks, and of course, blogs. Advocating your activities and projects via Twitter is an excellent idea, as it gets your point across with brief bits of text.
With every positive comes plenty of negatives, unfortunately. There are aspects of Twitter that are becoming more and more popular…and exponentially more annoying. Some of these are memes that start with one or two users, and eventually infect most of the userbase. (We’ve seen this happen with email and forums in the past.) Others are just virulent outgrowths of the service itself.
For example, the number of followers. I’ve noticed far too many people who are obsessed with how many followers they have. That’s the ultimate in narcissism, nothing more. When it comes to celebrity Twitter accounts, the problem is multiplied tenfold. As if their egos weren’t inflated enough!
Next, the spambots. Twitter’s done a decent job blocking them and deleting obvious spam accounts, but the shit still gets through. I’ll post something about my Mac, and I’ll get five or six responses within the next ten minutes from random accounts trying to sell me Apple crap. All fake, of course, but their existence is nonetheless aggravating.
Then there’s Twitter’s tagging system. As it was originally designed, it allowed groups of users to relate their tweets to one another. For example, for those users who watched the World Cup, placing a #worldcup tag on their tweets made them easier for other soccer fans to find and follow them. Twitter even got in on the act by appending a soccer ball image to those tags! However, like most other good intentions, the Internet community rapidly sent tagging down the toilet. How many tags have you seen that are actually relevant to the community as a whole? I’d say about 10% of them. Most of them nowadays are nonsense words that are lucky to have anything to do with the tweet itself, let alone the entire Twitter community.
Even worse, look at all of the miscreants who type out entire phrases in tag form. Not only is this a glaring misuse of the tagging system, it’s egocentric and it spotlights the user’s inability to use proper grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Come on, if you’re going to bother typing out #omgihadamassivesandwichforlunch, then just write “OMG, I had a massive sandwich for lunch!” like a adequately intelligent human being. Periods, spaces, and commas are your friends. Tagging is for categorizing similar tweets, not expression!
My biggest complaint about Twitter, by far, is livetweeting. Holy shit, is this annoying. In case you’re unaware, livetweeting is when a user tweets, nearly in realtime, their thoughts and opinions on a specific event, like a concert, film, or television show. Not only is this a massive feeding of the user’s ego — “Look what I get to do, while you only get to read about it in short bursts!” — it’s also extremely rude. Livetweeting a concert is rude to the band, as you’re essentially telling them that your social life is more important than the hard work they put into their performance. Livetweeting movies are even worse, as it’s incredibly distracting to other people in the audience. Look, if your followers gave a shit about the movie you’re seeing, they’d go see it themselves! We don’t need your play-by-play, Madden. Plus, if you’re livetweeting a film or show…you’re almost certain to give away spoilers. Thanks a lot, dick. I’ve had to unfollow quite a few people because of this. Spoilers nonwithstanding, few things are more irritating than seeing my feed clogged up by the same user posting twenty or more tweets in a row.
I’ve spent enough time complaining about many Twitter users’ irritating behavior. I will admit that some of my friends have been guilty of these offenses in the past, and when this happens, I do bring it to their attention. (Politely, of course.) Anyway, user excesses are clearly not the company’s fault, but I do have a separate set of concerns that apply to them. Twitter as a business is naturally trying to boost its own growth and bottom line. It’s been adding many new features to the service over time, like lists, suggestions on who to follow, verified users, geolocations, APIs, et cetera. However, like Facebook before it, some of this stuff is crossing the line into serious security issues. Verifying a user is a great idea, as followers can be confident in who they’re following, but it also means Twitter owns some serious personal data on you. Foursquare, another popular service that many people use in conjunction with Twitter, is practically an open invite for someone to stalk you or rob your house.
I can’t help but wonder if it’s only a matter of time before Twitter piles on the extras so much that becomes a bloated cesspool. At that point, I may elect to leave rather than deal with the spam, unwanted features, and invasion of privacy.
What, you don’t think this could come to pass? Well, remember that even MySpace used to be tolerable…

Seriously, what the fuck are you doing?! Who the hell wants to talk on the phone instead of enjoying the sun, surf, and sand?
A great evil has been awakened in this land, and it is the Facebook “Like” button. It’s got the capability to do far worse harm than merely eating your shield. (If you don’t understand that reference, I weep for you.)